Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
country-profiles:brazil [2019/05/06 11:36] – CSV data imported otd_wiki | country-profiles:brazil [2020/04/02 18:57] – [Homologation] Information provided by Coolab giudicejesica | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
In 2012, Anatel, Brazil' | In 2012, Anatel, Brazil' | ||
+ | |||
+ | In 2013, the agency creates a regulation that NGOs could provider internt access. | ||
In 2017, Anatel approved new rules to facilitate the performance of small regional suppliers that use cable or restricted radiation means. Examples are the 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands used by Wi-Fi systems. This is Resolution No. 680 of June 27, 2017, which allows the provision of service without authorization or license, just a registration on the page of the regulator. | In 2017, Anatel approved new rules to facilitate the performance of small regional suppliers that use cable or restricted radiation means. Examples are the 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands used by Wi-Fi systems. This is Resolution No. 680 of June 27, 2017, which allows the provision of service without authorization or license, just a registration on the page of the regulator. | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
There are currently three pilot community cellular telephony projects in the Amazon operated by the Federal University of Pará. Finally, the Universalization Fund (FUST), in the current model, allows its use for the attention of rural and remote areas, but only through the fixed telephony service. | There are currently three pilot community cellular telephony projects in the Amazon operated by the Federal University of Pará. Finally, the Universalization Fund (FUST), in the current model, allows its use for the attention of rural and remote areas, but only through the fixed telephony service. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the context of community networks, there are no explicit legal and regulatory frameworks, but, as already pointed out, there are regulations that symmetrically allow the operation of such non-profit networks. | ||
+ | Regulatory symmetry also generates a scenario of inequality, facilitating only service operators through business models. In this context, it is necessary to advance the legal and regulatory framework in several aspects, such as spectrum access, equipment homologation, | ||
===== Operator Licensing ===== | ===== Operator Licensing ===== | ||
+ | Resolution for SCM license (commercial operators): https:// | ||
+ | Resolution for SLP license (NGOs could operate internet providers) | ||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Resolution for license exempt (commercial or non profit operators): https:// | ||
==== Technical and Administrative Requirements ==== | ==== Technical and Administrative Requirements ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Procedures for SCM license (commercial operators with or without license): https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Procedures for SLP license (Non profit operators could provide internet with or without license) | ||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Manual for MOSAICO platform: https:// | ||
==== Licensing Fees ==== | ==== Licensing Fees ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Resolution for PPDESS: https:// | ||
+ | (for SCM: R$ 400,00; for SLP: R$ 20,00) | ||
===== Access to Spectrum ===== | ===== Access to Spectrum ===== | ||
==== Technical and Administrative Requirements ==== | ==== Technical and Administrative Requirements ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Procedures for self registration in the STEL system: https:// | ||
=== Licensed === | === Licensed === | ||
+ | Only authorized telecom operators could ask for licensed radio frequencies. | ||
== Access Networks == | == Access Networks == | ||
Line 39: | Line 62: | ||
== PtP Networks == | == PtP Networks == | ||
- | === License-Exempt === | + | === License-Exempt |
+ | |||
+ | As noticed the resolution 680/2017 already allow the usage of non licensed spectrum, just making a registration, | ||
== Access Networks == | == Access Networks == | ||
Line 61: | Line 86: | ||
| 5470-5725 MHz | '' | | 5470-5725 MHz | '' | ||
| 5725-5800 MHz | '' | | 5725-5800 MHz | '' | ||
- | |||
=== Secondary Use === | === Secondary Use === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The costs are more low now, but, we need to advance more in the primary use and the questions about regulatory asymmetries making differences between profit and non profit operators. For example fixing the costs of radio frequencies usage for non profit operators and creating rules for sanction the inefficient spectrum use, allowing that non profit operators could use those radio frequencies in secondary and primary usages. | ||
== Access Networks == | == Access Networks == | ||
Line 69: | Line 95: | ||
==== Spectrum Fees / Costs ==== | ==== Spectrum Fees / Costs ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Resolution of PPDUR: https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Simulation of PPDUR costs: https:// | ||
=== Application === | === Application === | ||
Line 76: | Line 106: | ||
===== Backhaul ===== | ===== Backhaul ===== | ||
+ | The right to interconnection for non profit | ||
+ | |||
+ | Resolution 590/2012 (EILD): https:// | ||
===== Gender ===== | ===== Gender ===== | ||
- | ===== Universal | + | ===== Universal |
+ | |||
+ | In the history of the telecom funds (mainly the FUST) in Brazil, always it benefits the great operators or the federal government. In 2019, the modification of the laws to make a more profitable scenario of the great telcos happened again and about 108 billions of reais in infrastructure was donated for the 3 big telcos in the country (OI, Telefonica, Claro/ | ||
+ | In parallel the TACs (conduct adjustment term) is discussed in Anatel for years about the debits of the telcos with the Brazilian State. | ||
+ | Those two resources (FUST and TACs) sum more then 25 billions. | ||
+ | The PERT like said above, is a plan to make agreements of Exchange with those big telcos to apply these resources to universalization | ||
+ | In the PERT, for civil society, it is important the application of part of the resources in the essential public networks, even after the loss of the public infrastructure with the law changes. | ||
+ | About the TACs, the civil society are debating that part of those resources could be applied in Community networks and other kind of public and community policies to expand the internet access, mainly in rural and undeserved areas. | ||
===== Cooperatives ===== | ===== Cooperatives ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Homologation ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In 2019, the agency make modification in the resolution for equipment homologation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Resolution 715/2019: https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Information from the telecommunications regulatory agency (ANATEL): | ||
+ | Certifications and Numbering Management: orcn@anatel.gov.br | ||
+ | certifying agency: https:// | ||
+ | In the list above, we chose "UL do Brasil", | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the list above, we have chosen UL do Brasil, which has the price Prerequisites: | ||
+ | Manufacturer identification (company name, address, contact) | ||
+ | Samples with configuration instruction | ||
+ | Installation Manual | ||
+ | Identification of the legal representative (company) | ||
+ | External and internal photos | ||
+ | Technical specification | ||
+ | Electrical diagram | ||
+ | Letter of representation (letter signed by Dragino - manufacturer - for Kill9Networks to be the representative of libre router in Brazil) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Administrative procedure: | ||
+ | We started the process with UL do Brasil. The bills have been paid and we are waiting for the project engineer to contact us | ||
+ | |||
+ | Carrying out tests: | ||
+ | The OCD is responsible for choosing the laboratory, which costs are included. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Completion, scope and duration of approval: | ||
+ | - The homologation certificate is issued by ANATEL, which takes around 7 days. | ||
+ | - The renewal of the homologation must be done every 2 years. If there are no changes in the hardware, it is not necessary to redo the laboratory tests. | ||
+ | Value paid for the certification: | ||
+ | ===== Fiscalization ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the Resolution 589/2012 it is important to change the sanction of unauthorized/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Resolution 589/2012: https:// | ||
===== Resources / References ===== | ===== Resources / References ===== |